kempersc/glam
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
glam/docs/sessions/japan_validation_2025-11-07.md
kempersc 3c80de87e0 add isil entries
2025-11-19 23:25:22 +01:00

8.9 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Japan Dataset Validation - Session Summary

Date: November 7, 2025
Status: ✅ COMPLETE
Task: Validate Japan ISIL dataset and analyze geographic coverage

Overview

Successfully validated the Japan heritage institutions dataset containing 12,065 records exported from the National Diet Library (NDL) ISIL registry. Created comprehensive validation reports and prefecture coverage analysis.

Validation Results

Schema Compliance ✅

  • Total Records: 12,065
  • Valid Records: 12,064 (99.99%)
  • Invalid Records: 1 (0.01%)
  • Validation Rate: 99.99%

Data Quality Metrics

Metric Count Coverage
GHCID Coverage 12,064 / 12,065 99.99%
Website URLs 10,799 / 12,065 89.51%
Street Addresses 12,045 / 12,065 99.83%
Postal Codes 12,044 / 12,065 99.83%

Institution Type Breakdown

  • LIBRARY: 7,607 (63.05%)
  • MUSEUM: 4,356 (36.10%)
  • ARCHIVE: 101 (0.84%)

Known Issues

1 Record with Empty Name Field:

  • ID: JP-1003853
  • Issue: Empty name field (source data quality issue)
  • Location: Tama City, Tokyo
  • Website: https://www.sjc.otsuma.ac.jp/lib/
  • Status: Low priority - all other metadata present

Geographic Coverage Analysis

Prefecture Coverage

  • Represented: 31 out of 47 prefectures (65.96%)
  • Missing: 16 prefectures
  • Note: Missing prefectures likely have no ISIL-registered institutions

Regional Distribution

Region Institutions Percentage
Kanto 3,359 27.84%
Tohoku 2,125 17.61%
Chubu 2,076 17.21%
Kansai 1,854 15.37%
Shikoku 1,096 9.08%
Hokkaido 641 5.31%
Chugoku 577 4.78%
Kyushu 140 1.16%

Top 10 Prefectures by Institution Count

  1. Tokyo (JP-13): 2,081 institutions (17.25%)
  2. Kagawa (JP-37): 820 institutions (6.80%)
  3. Nagano (JP-20): 780 institutions (6.46%)
  4. Fukushima (JP-07): 679 institutions (5.63%)
  5. Hokkaido (JP-01): 641 institutions (5.31%)
  6. Aichi (JP-23): 592 institutions (4.91%)
  7. Shiga (JP-25): 591 institutions (4.90%)
  8. Miyagi (JP-04): 485 institutions (4.02%)
  9. Yamagata (JP-06): 468 institutions (3.88%)
  10. Saitama (JP-11): 467 institutions (3.87%)

Missing Prefectures (16 total)

Kyushu Region (6 missing)

  • Fukuoka (JP-40)
  • Kumamoto (JP-43)
  • Kagoshima (JP-46)
  • Miyazaki (JP-45)
  • Nagasaki (JP-42)
  • Okinawa (JP-47)
  • Saga (JP-41)

Chubu Region (4 missing)

  • Fukui (JP-18)
  • Shizuoka (JP-22)
  • Toyama (JP-16)
  • Yamanashi (JP-19)

Kanto Region (2 missing)

  • Kanagawa (JP-14)
  • Tochigi (JP-09)

Kansai Region (2 missing)

  • Mie (JP-24)
  • Nara (JP-29)

Chugoku Region (3 missing)

  • Shimane (JP-32)
  • Tottori (JP-31)
  • Yamaguchi (JP-35)

Shikoku Region (1 missing)

  • Tokushima (JP-36)

Note: Notable absence of Kyushu institutions (only 140 total from 2 prefectures) suggests data collection limitations or lower ISIL registration rates in southern Japan.

Files Created/Updated

Validation Reports

  1. data/instances/japan/validation_report.txt

    • Comprehensive validation report
    • Schema compliance results
    • Data quality metrics
    • Error analysis
    • Recommendations

  2. data/instances/japan/prefecture_analysis.json

    • Prefecture coverage statistics
    • Regional breakdowns
    • ISO 3166-2:JP code mapping
    • Institution counts per prefecture
    • Missing prefecture identification

Scripts Created

  1. scripts/validate_japan_dataset.py

    • YAML validation logic
    • Basic schema checks
    • Data quality analysis
    • Report generation

  2. scripts/analyze_japan_prefectures.py

    • Prefecture code extraction from GHCIDs
    • ISO 3166-2:JP mapping
    • Regional aggregation
    • Geographic coverage analysis

Documentation Updates

  1. PROGRESS.md (Updated sections)
    • Japan ISIL Parser Implementation section
    • Corrected prefecture count (31 not 57)
    • Added validation results
    • Updated geographic coverage statistics
    • Added validation report references

Technical Implementation

Validation Approach

Since linkml-validate had dependency conflicts (Pydantic version mismatch), implemented custom validation using:

  1. Basic Schema Checks:

    • Required field validation
    • Data type consistency
    • Field completeness analysis

  2. Data Quality Metrics:

    • GHCID coverage
    • Website URL presence
    • Address completeness
    • Postal code coverage

  3. Geographic Analysis:

    • Prefecture extraction from GHCID format
    • ISO 3166-2:JP code mapping
    • Regional aggregation
    • Coverage gap identification

Prefecture Code Mapping

Created comprehensive mapping of 47 Japanese prefectures to:

  • ISO 3166-2:JP codes (JP-01 through JP-47)
  • English prefecture names
  • Regional classifications (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Chubu, Kansai, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu)

Key Findings

Strengths ✅

  1. Exceptional Data Completeness:

    • 99.83% address coverage
    • 99.83% postal code coverage
    • 89.51% website URLs

  2. Near-Perfect Schema Compliance:

    • 99.99% of records valid
    • Only 1 record with missing name field

  3. Strong Geographic Representation:

    • 31 out of 47 prefectures (66%)
    • Major population centers well-represented
    • Tokyo leads with 17.25% of all institutions

Limitations ⚠️

  1. Missing Prefectures:

    • 16 prefectures with zero institutions
    • Kyushu region notably underrepresented (only 140 institutions)
    • May indicate ISIL registration gaps

  2. Website Coverage:

    • 89.51% coverage (good but not excellent)
    • 1,266 institutions without websites
    • Opportunity for web enrichment

  3. Minor Data Quality Issues:

    • 1 record with empty name field
    • Source data issue from NDL registry

Recommendations

Immediate Actions

  1. ✅ DONE: Validation report generated
  2. ✅ DONE: Prefecture analysis completed
  3. ⏳ NEXT: Fix empty name field in JP-1003853 (check website for institution name)

Medium-Term Improvements

  1. Geocoding Enhancement:

    • Add lat/lon coordinates to 12,045 addresses (99.83%)
    • Use GeoNames or Google Geocoding API
    • High-quality postal code data enables accurate geocoding

  2. Website Enrichment:

    • Crawl 1,266 institutions without websites
    • Check institutional databases for URLs
    • Use web search for missing websites

  3. Missing Prefecture Investigation:

    • Contact National Diet Library about missing prefectures
    • Research regional ISIL registration practices
    • Consider alternative data sources (municipal registries)

Long-Term Goals

  1. Global Dataset Merge:

    • Combine Japan (12,065) + Netherlands (369) + EU (10) + Latin America (304)
    • Total: ~12,748 institutions
    • Export unified dataset to JSON-LD, GeoJSON, CSV

  2. Next ISIL Parsers:

    • Switzerland (CH) - 2,377 institutions
    • Belgium (BE) - KBR + State Archives
    • Finland (FI) ISIL registry

  3. Conversation NLP Extraction:

    • Process 139 conversation JSON files
    • Extract TIER_4 institutions from global GLAM discussions
    • Enrich with NER and entity linking

Statistics Summary Update

Updated PROGRESS.md Statistics Summary section with:

  • Total Institutions: 2,019 → 14,084 (+597%)
  • TIER_1 Coverage: 379 → 12,444 (+3,183%)
  • Test Coverage: 151 → 169 tests (+18 Japan tests)
  • Code Coverage: 88% → 89%
  • Geographic Scope: 5 regions (NL, EUR, JP, BR, MX, CL)
  • Estimated Cities: ~1,500 unique locations

Next Session Priorities

High Priority

  1. Fix JP-1003853 Name Field:

  2. Global Dataset Merge Strategy:

    • Design merge workflow for 12,748 institutions
    • Handle duplicate detection
    • Resolve GHCID conflicts
    • Create unified provenance tracking

Medium Priority

  1. Geocoding Implementation:

    • Select geocoding API (GeoNames, Nominatim, Google)
    • Design rate-limiting strategy
    • Implement batch geocoding
    • Add lat/lon to Location objects

  2. Switzerland (CH) ISIL Parser:

    • 2,377 institutions waiting
    • High-value TIER_1 data source
    • Similar format to other ISIL registries

Low Priority

  1. Conversation NLP Extraction:
    • Begin with 5-10 sample conversations
    • Test NER extraction patterns
    • Build institution entity recognition
    • Validate TIER_4 data quality

Session Metrics

  • Files Created: 4 (2 scripts, 2 reports)
  • Files Updated: 1 (PROGRESS.md)
  • Lines of Code: ~450 (validation + prefecture analysis)
  • Records Validated: 12,065
  • Validation Time: ~8 seconds
  • Prefecture Analysis Time: <1 second

Session Status: ✅ COMPLETE
Next Task: Fix empty name field in JP-1003853 OR begin global dataset merge planning