glam/data/instances/archive/brazilian_curation_report.md

Brazilian GLAM Institution Curation Report

Generated: 2025-11-06T08:25:13.589472+00:00

Summary Statistics

• Original records (v2): 104
• Filtered out (platforms/non-institutions): 7
• Valid curated institutions: 97
• Recall rate: 93.3%

Curation Actions

Records Filtered Out

The following records were removed as they are platforms/technologies, not heritage institutions:

1. Tainacan - Collection management platform (WordPress-based)
2. AtoM - Archival description software
3. DSpace - Digital repository platform
4. APIs - Generic technology reference
5. LOCKSS Cariniana - Digital preservation network
6. Population - Demographic data (Roraima indigenous population statistic)
7. Documentation - Too generic, not a specific institution

Valid Institutions Retained

97 heritage custodian organizations representing:

• Museums (MUSEUM, MIXED)
• Libraries (LIBRARY)
• Archives (ARCHIVE)
• Research centers (RESEARCH_CENTER)
• Educational providers (EDUCATION_PROVIDER)
• Official institutions (OFFICIAL_INSTITUTION)

Quality Metrics

Completeness (by field)

To be calculated after enrichment:

• Records with descriptions: TBD
• Records with identifiers: TBD
• Records with city names: TBD
• Records with digital platforms: TBD

Geographic Coverage

All 27 Brazilian states + Federal District represented

Next Steps

1. Deep enrichment needed: Extract comprehensive metadata from conversation JSON

   • Founding dates and change history
   • Collection descriptions with subjects/extents
   • Digital platform URLs and systems
   • Additional identifiers (Wikidata, VIAF, etc.)

2. Manual verification: Review Brasiliana Museus and Hemeroteca Digital

   • Classify as national aggregation platforms vs. custodian institutions

3. Field completion: Achieve targets:

   • 90%+ with descriptions (2-4 sentences)
   • 80%+ with website identifiers
   • 60%+ with city-level location data

---

Generated by curate_brazilian_institutions.py