- Implemented `owl_to_mermaid.py` to convert OWL/Turtle files into Mermaid class diagrams. - Implemented `owl_to_plantuml.py` to convert OWL/Turtle files into PlantUML class diagrams. - Added two new PlantUML files for custodian multi-aspect diagrams.
12 KiB
Complete Session Overview: Appellation Refactoring Journey
Date: 2025-11-22
Total Sessions: 2 (Phase 1 + Phase 2)
Final Status: ✅ COMPLETE
The Journey: From Orphaned Classes to SKOS-Aligned Architecture
Starting Point (Before Phase 1)
Custodian (hub) CustodianAppellation (orphaned)
| |
| X (no connection!)
|
CustodianIdentifier (orphaned)
Problems:
- Appellation and Identifier classes existed but weren't connected to anything
- No way to link alternative names or external IDs to custodians
- Incomplete ontology model
Phase 1: Connecting Orphaned Classes (Morning, Nov 22)
Goal: Connect Appellation and Identifier to the Custodian hub
Solution:
Custodian (hub)
├── crm:P1_is_identified_by ──→ CustodianAppellation
│ └── crm:P1i_identifies ──→ (back to hub)
│
└── crm:P48_has_preferred_identifier ──→ CustodianIdentifier
└── crm:P48i_is_preferred_identifier_of ──→ (back to hub)
Results:
- ✅ Bidirectional linking implemented
- ✅ CIDOC-CRM properties used
- ✅ Schema validates
- ⚠️ BUT: Semantic confusion - both Appellation and Identifier claim to "identify" hub
Documentation: APPELLATION_IDENTIFIER_REFACTORING_20251122.md
Phase 2: SKOS Alignment (Afternoon, Nov 22)
Goal: Fix semantic confusion by distinguishing identifiers from name variants
Insight:
CustodianIdentifiershould be the ONLY class that identifies the hubCustodianAppellationshould be variants of the canonical NAME (not hub identifiers)
Solution:
Custodian (hub)
├── skos:prefLabel ──→ CustodianName (canonical emic name)
│ └── skos:altLabel ──→ CustodianAppellation (name variants)
│ └── skos:broader ──→ (back to name)
│
└── crm:P48_has_preferred_identifier ──→ CustodianIdentifier (external IDs)
└── crm:P48i_is_preferred_identifier_of ──→ (back to hub)
Key Changes:
- ❌ Removed:
Custodian.appellationsslot - ✅ Added:
CustodianName.alternative_namesslot - 🔄 Changed:
crm:P1_is_identified_by→skos:altLabel - 🔄 Changed:
crm:P1i_identifies→skos:broader
Results:
- ✅ Clear semantic distinction: Identifiers identify hub, Appellations are name variants
- ✅ W3C SKOS best practices alignment
- ✅ Ontology interoperability improved
- ✅ Schema validates
- ✅ RDF outputs generated (4 formats)
- ✅ ER diagram generated (176 lines)
Documentation: APPELLATION_REFACTORING_PHASE2_20251122.md
Architecture Evolution Diagram
graph TD
subgraph "Before Phase 1"
C1[Custodian hub]
A1[CustodianAppellation - ORPHANED]
I1[CustodianIdentifier - ORPHANED]
C1 -.x.- A1
C1 -.x.- I1
style A1 fill:#f99,stroke:#f00
style I1 fill:#f99,stroke:#f00
end
subgraph "After Phase 1"
C2[Custodian hub]
A2[CustodianAppellation]
I2[CustodianIdentifier]
C2 -->|crm:P1_is_identified_by| A2
A2 -->|crm:P1i_identifies| C2
C2 -->|crm:P48_has_preferred_identifier| I2
I2 -->|crm:P48i_is_preferred_identifier_of| C2
style A2 fill:#ff9,stroke:#990
style I2 fill:#ff9,stroke:#990
end
subgraph "After Phase 2 - FINAL"
C3[Custodian hub]
N3[CustodianName]
A3[CustodianAppellation]
I3[CustodianIdentifier]
C3 -->|skos:prefLabel| N3
N3 -->|skos:altLabel| A3
A3 -->|skos:broader| N3
C3 -->|crm:P48_has_preferred_identifier| I3
I3 -->|crm:P48i_is_preferred_identifier_of| C3
style N3 fill:#9f9,stroke:#090
style A3 fill:#9f9,stroke:#090
style I3 fill:#9f9,stroke:#090
end
Legend:
- 🔴 Red: Orphaned/disconnected classes (Phase 1 input)
- 🟡 Yellow: Connected but semantically confused (Phase 1 output)
- 🟢 Green: Correctly connected and semantically clear (Phase 2 output - FINAL)
Semantic Evolution
Phase 1 → Phase 2 Semantics
| Aspect | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| What identifies hub? | Both Appellation AND Identifier | ONLY Identifier | ✅ Clear hub identification |
| What are appellations? | Hub identifiers | Name variants | ✅ Correct abstraction level |
| Property used | crm:P1_is_identified_by |
skos:altLabel |
✅ Ontology alignment |
| Connected to | Custodian (hub) | CustodianName (aspect) | ✅ Multi-aspect modeling |
| Standards compliance | CIDOC-CRM | CIDOC-CRM + W3C SKOS | ✅ Best practices |
Files Changed Summary
Phase 1 (Morning)
Created:
modules/slots/appellations.yaml(later deprecated in Phase 2)modules/slots/identifies_custodian.yaml
Modified:
modules/classes/Appellation.yaml→ Addedidentifies_custodianslotmodules/classes/Identifier.yaml→ Addedidentifies_custodianslotmodules/classes/Custodian.yaml→ Addedappellationsandidentifiersslots01_custodian_name_modular.yaml→ Added imports
Result: 86 total files (+2 from Phase 1)
Phase 2 (Afternoon)
Created:
modules/slots/alternative_names.yaml(replacesappellations.yaml)modules/slots/variant_of_name.yaml
Deprecated:
modules/slots/appellations.yaml(kept for historical reference)
Modified:
modules/classes/Appellation.yaml→ Changed from Custodian to CustodianName connectionmodules/classes/Custodian.yaml→ Removedappellationsslotmodules/classes/CustodianName.yaml→ Addedalternative_namesslot01_custodian_name_modular.yaml→ Updated imports
Result: 86 total files (same count, but appellations.yaml deprecated)
Generated Outputs
RDF Serializations (Phase 2)
| Format | Timestamp | Size | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| OWL/Turtle | 20251122_181217 | 160 KB | ✅ Valid |
| N-Triples | 20251122_181224 | 458 KB | ✅ Valid |
| JSON-LD | 20251122_181224 | 382 KB | ✅ Valid |
| RDF/XML | 20251122_181224 | 330 KB | ✅ Valid |
UML Diagrams (Phase 2)
| Format | Timestamp | Lines | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mermaid ER | 20251122_181237 | 176 | ✅ Valid |
Verified Relationships:
✅ Custodian ||--|o CustodianName : "preferred_label"
✅ CustodianName ||--}o CustodianAppellation : "alternative_names"
✅ CustodianAppellation ||--|o CustodianName : "variant_of_name"
✅ Custodian ||--}o CustodianIdentifier : "identifiers"
✅ CustodianIdentifier ||--|o Custodian : "identifies_custodian"
❌ No direct Custodian ↔ Appellation (correct by design!)
Documentation Artifacts
Phase 1 Documentation
- ✅
APPELLATION_IDENTIFIER_REFACTORING_20251122.md(284 lines)- Complete Phase 1 technical documentation
- CIDOC-CRM property explanations
- Validation results
Phase 2 Documentation
-
✅
APPELLATION_REFACTORING_PHASE2_20251122.md(500+ lines)- Complete Phase 2 technical documentation
- SKOS alignment rationale
- Design decisions
- Migration path
-
✅
SESSION_COMPLETE_20251122_APPELLATION_PHASE2.md(150 lines)- Phase 2 quick reference
- Validation status
- Next steps
-
✅
COMPLETE_SESSION_OVERVIEW_20251122.md(This document)- Journey overview
- Architecture evolution
- Complete summary
Testing & Validation
Schema Validation ✅
$ gen-owl -f ttl 01_custodian_name_modular.yaml
# Phase 1: ✅ PASS (warnings only)
# Phase 2: ✅ PASS (warnings only)
ER Diagram Validation ✅
- Phase 1: ✅ Both Custodian → Appellation and Custodian → Identifier present
- Phase 2: ✅ CustodianName → Appellation present, Custodian → Appellation removed
Ontology Alignment ✅
- Phase 1: ✅ CIDOC-CRM properties correctly used
- Phase 2: ✅ SKOS properties correctly used + CIDOC-CRM maintained
Breaking Changes & Migration
Phase 1 → Phase 2 Breaking Changes
Data Structure Change:
# Phase 1 (DEPRECATED)
Custodian:
hc_id: https://nde.nl/ontology/hc/cust/123
appellations:
- appellation_value: "BnF"
# Phase 2 (CURRENT)
Custodian:
hc_id: https://nde.nl/ontology/hc/cust/123
preferred_label:
emic_name: "Bibliothèque nationale de France"
alternative_names:
- appellation_value: "BnF"
Migration Required: ⏳ TODO
- Script:
scripts/migrate_appellations_phase2_20251122.py - Action: Convert all existing Phase 1 data to Phase 2 structure
Success Metrics
Completeness ✅
- Phase 1: Connect orphaned classes
- Phase 2: SKOS alignment
- Schema validation
- RDF generation (4 formats)
- UML diagram generation
- Comprehensive documentation
Quality ✅
- No schema errors
- Ontology best practices followed (CIDOC-CRM + W3C SKOS)
- Clear semantic distinctions
- Bidirectional relationships
- Deprecation path documented
Remaining Work ⏳
- Data migration script
- Unit tests
- Update README.md architecture diagrams
- Update SCHEMA_MODULES.md
Lessons Learned
Design Insights
- Iterative Refinement: Phase 1 was necessary to connect classes, but Phase 2 was needed for semantic correctness
- Ontology Consultation: Always review base ontologies (SKOS, CIDOC-CRM) before designing relationships
- Hub Architecture: The hub should only be identified by
CustodianIdentifier, not by appellations - Aspect Modeling: Each aspect (Name, LegalStatus, Place) has its own lifecycle and relationships
Technical Insights
- LinkML Modularity: Individual slot files make refactoring easier (can deprecate without breaking schema)
- Bidirectional Relationships: Always implement inverse properties for navigability
- Deprecation Strategy: Keep old files with clear migration instructions
- Validation Workflow: Generate RDF + ER diagrams to verify changes visually
Next Agent Handoff
For Continuing Work:
If you're working on data migration:
- Read
APPELLATION_REFACTORING_PHASE2_20251122.md(lines 240-270 for migration examples) - Create
scripts/migrate_appellations_phase2_20251122.py - Test on sample data before batch processing
If you're updating documentation:
- Use generated ER diagram:
schemas/20251121/uml/mermaid/01_custodian_name_modular_20251122_181237_er.mmd - Update README.md architecture section
- Update SCHEMA_MODULES.md with new slots (
alternative_names,variant_of_name)
If you're writing tests:
- Test CustodianName with multiple alternative_names
- Test bidirectional navigation (name → appellation → name)
- Validate RDF serialization of
skos:altLabelandskos:broader
Final Status
Phase 1: ✅ COMPLETE (Morning, Nov 22)
Phase 2: ✅ COMPLETE (Afternoon, Nov 22)
Schema: ✅ VALIDATED
RDF Outputs: ✅ GENERATED (4 formats)
UML Diagrams: ✅ GENERATED (Mermaid ER)
Documentation: ✅ COMPREHENSIVE (4 documents)
Overall Status: 🎉 READY FOR NEXT PHASE (Migration & Testing)
Total Time: ~4 hours (2 phases)
Files Modified: 7 schema modules + 1 main schema
Files Generated: 5 outputs (4 RDF + 1 UML)
Documentation: 4 comprehensive documents (~1500+ lines total)
End of Complete Session Overview