glam/data/person/_PROFILE_RISK_REPORT.md

Person Profile Risk Assessment Report

Generated: 2026-01-11T12:38:48.474833

Summary Statistics

Metric	Count	Percentage
Total Profiles Analyzed	40,122	100%
Needs Manual Review	556	1.4%
High/Very High Risk Names	628	1.6%
Has HIGH RISK Domain Claims	0	0.0%
Has LinkedIn Mismatch	0	0.0%

Risk Level Distribution

Risk Level	Count	Percentage
Critical (0.7+)	0	0.0%
High (0.5-0.7)	0	0.0%
Medium (0.3-0.5)	219	0.5%
Low (<0.3)	39,903	99.5%

Top 25 Highest Risk Profiles

These profiles need immediate manual review.

Rank	Name	Risk Score	Name Risk	Claims	Issues
1	Bram van den Berg	0.47	medium	7	-
2	Anna Dijkstra	0.40	medium	0	-
3	Jan de Ruiter	0.40	medium	4	-
4	Johannes van der Meer	0.40	medium	6	-
5	Anna Meijer	0.40	medium	1	-
6	Pieter de Boer	0.40	high	8	Common name (high)
7	Maria Smit	0.40	high	4	Common name (high)
8	Jan Kuiper	0.40	medium	12	-
9	Pieter de Groot	0.40	medium	8	-
10	Maria Kuipers	0.40	medium	12	-
11	Pieter Groot	0.40	medium	8	-
12	Jan van der Meulen	0.40	medium	8	-
13	Jan Visser	0.40	high	14	Common name (high)
14	Pieter Smit	0.40	high	8	Common name (high)
15	Anna Martens	0.40	medium	0	-
16	Jan de Jong	0.40	high	8	Common name (high)
17	Jan Postma	0.40	medium	8	-
18	maria schouten	0.40	medium	8	-
19	Pieter Willems	0.40	medium	0	-
20	Jan Stam	0.40	medium	12	-
21	Anna Janssen	0.40	high	12	Common name (high)
22	Pieter Dijkstra	0.40	medium	8	-
23	Jan Janssen	0.40	high	8	Common name (high)
24	Jan de Bruijn	0.40	medium	12	-
25	Anna de Wit	0.40	medium	12	-

---

DATA QUALITY IS OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE - Wrong data is worse than no data.