glam/SESSION_SUMMARY_SPARQL_PHASE6_20251122.md
kempersc 6eb18700f0 Add SHACL validation shapes and validation script for Heritage Custodian Ontology
- Created SHACL shapes for validating temporal consistency and bidirectional relationships in custodial collections and staff observations.
- Implemented a Python script to validate RDF data against the defined SHACL shapes using the pyshacl library.
- Added command-line interface for validation with options for specifying data formats and output reports.
- Included detailed error handling and reporting for validation results.
2025-11-22 23:22:10 +01:00

184 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown

# Session Summary: Phase 6 - SPARQL Query Library
**Date**: 2025-11-22
**Schema Version**: v0.7.0 (stable, no changes)
**Duration**: ~45 minutes
**Status**: ✅ COMPLETE
---
## What We Did
### Phase 6 Goal
Document comprehensive SPARQL query patterns for querying heritage custodian organizational data, collections, and staff relationships.
### Deliverable
**File**: `docs/SPARQL_QUERIES_ORGANIZATIONAL.md` (1,168 lines)
---
## What Was Created
### 1. SPARQL Query Documentation (31 Queries)
**Category Breakdown**:
- **Staff Queries** (5): Curators, role changes, expertise matching
- **Collection Queries** (5): Managing units, temporal coverage, collection types
- **Combined Staff + Collection** (4): Curator-collection matching, department inventories
- **Organizational Change** (4): Custody transfers, restructuring impacts, timelines
- **Validation Queries** (5): SPARQL equivalents of Phase 5 Python validation rules
- **Advanced Temporal** (8): Point-in-time snapshots, tenure analysis, provenance chains
### 2. Key Features Documented
**SPARQL 1.1 Compliance** - All queries use standard syntax
**Temporal Query Patterns** - Allen interval algebra for date overlaps
**Validation Queries** - RDF triple store equivalents of Phase 5 rules
**Aggregation Queries** - AVG, COUNT, SUM for analytics
**Optimization Tips** - Filter placement, OPTIONAL usage, indexing
**Usage Examples** - Python rdflib + Apache Jena Fuseki
### 3. Integration with Previous Phases
**Phase 3 (Staff Roles)**:
- Queries 1.1-1.5 leverage `PersonObservation` class
- Role change tracking (Query 1.3)
- Expertise matching (Query 1.5)
**Phase 4 (Collection-Department Integration)**:
- Queries 2.1-2.2 use `managing_unit``managed_collections`
- Bidirectional consistency queries (5.2, 5.5)
- Department inventory reports (Query 3.4)
**Phase 5 (Validation Framework)**:
- All 5 validation rules converted to SPARQL (Queries 5.1-5.5)
- Temporal consistency checks
- Bidirectional relationship validation
---
## Files Created
1. **`docs/SPARQL_QUERIES_ORGANIZATIONAL.md`** (1,168 lines)
- 31 complete SPARQL queries
- Expected results + explanations
- Query optimization guidelines
- Testing instructions
2. **`SPARQL_QUERY_LIBRARY_COMPLETE_20251122.md`** (completion report)
---
## Key Achievements
### 1. Comprehensive Query Coverage
- ✅ All 22 classes queryable
- ✅ All 98 slots accessible
- ✅ 5 validation rules in SPARQL
- ✅ 8 advanced temporal patterns
### 2. Real-World Use Cases
- Department inventory reports
- Staff tenure analysis
- Organizational complexity scoring
- Provenance chain reconstruction
### 3. Validation Integration
- Python validator (Phase 5) for development
- SPARQL queries for production monitoring
- Complementary approaches
---
## Technical Highlights
### Temporal Query Pattern (Allen Interval Algebra)
```sparql
# Find entities valid during query period
FILTER(?validFrom <= ?queryEnd)
FILTER(!BOUND(?validTo) || ?validTo >= ?queryStart)
```
Used in: Queries 1.4, 2.4, 6.1, 6.3
### Bidirectional Relationship Validation
```sparql
# Detect missing inverse relationships
FILTER NOT EXISTS {
?unit custodian:managed_collections ?collection
}
```
Used in: Queries 5.2, 5.5
### Provenance Chain Reconstruction
```sparql
# Trace custody history chronologically
?collection custodian:custody_history ?custodyEvent .
?custodyEvent prov:wasInformedBy ?changeEvent .
ORDER BY ?transferDate
```
Used in: Queries 4.1, 6.3
---
## Testing Status
| Test Type | Status | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| **Syntax Validation** | ✅ COMPLETE | All queries SPARQL 1.1 compliant |
| **Schema Compatibility** | ✅ COMPLETE | Verified against v0.7.0 RDF schema |
| **Instance Data Testing** | ⚠️ DEFERRED | Requires YAML→RDF conversion (Phase 7) |
**Note**: Full end-to-end testing requires converting test instances to RDF triples.
---
## Success Criteria - All Met ✅
| Criterion | Target | Achieved | Status |
|-----------|--------|----------|--------|
| Query Count | 20+ | 31 | ✅ 155% |
| Categories | 5 | 6 | ✅ 120% |
| Examples | All queries | 31/31 | ✅ 100% |
| Validation Queries | 5 rules | 5 queries | ✅ 100% |
| Explanations | Clear | 31/31 | ✅ 100% |
---
## What's Next: Phase 7 - SHACL Shapes
### Objective
Convert validation queries into **SHACL shapes** for automatic RDF validation at data ingestion time.
### Why SHACL?
- ✅ Prevent invalid data entry (not just detect)
- ✅ Standardized validation reports
- ✅ Triple store integration (GraphDB, Jena)
- ✅ Detailed error messages
### Deliverables (Phase 7)
1. SHACL shape file: `schemas/20251121/shacl/custodian_validation_shapes.ttl`
2. Documentation: `docs/SHACL_VALIDATION_SHAPES.md`
3. Validation script: `scripts/validate_with_shacl.py`
### Estimated Time
60-75 minutes
---
## References
- **Query Library**: `docs/SPARQL_QUERIES_ORGANIZATIONAL.md`
- **Completion Report**: `SPARQL_QUERY_LIBRARY_COMPLETE_20251122.md`
- **Schema (v0.7.0)**: `schemas/20251121/linkml/01_custodian_name_modular.yaml`
- **Test Data**: `schemas/20251121/examples/collection_department_integration_examples.yaml`
- **Phase 5 Summary**: `SESSION_SUMMARY_VALIDATION_PHASE5_20251122.md`
---
**Phase 6 Status**: ✅ **COMPLETE**
**Next Phase**: Phase 7 - SHACL Shapes
**Overall Progress**: 6/9 phases complete (67%)