- Introduced `has_api_version`, `has_appellation_language`, `has_appellation_type`, `has_appellation_value`, `has_applicable_country`, `has_application_deadline`, `has_application_opening_date`, `has_appraisal_note`, `has_approval_date`, `has_archdiocese_name`, `has_architectural_style`, `has_archival_reference`, `has_archive_description`, `has_archive_memento_uri`, `has_archive_name`, `has_archive_path`, `has_archive_search_score`, `has_arrangement`, `has_arrangement_level`, `has_arrangement_note`, `has_articles_archival_stage`, `has_articles_document_format`, `has_articles_document_url`, `has_articles_of_association`, `has_or_had_altitude`, `has_or_had_annotation`, `has_or_had_arrangement`, `has_or_had_document`, `has_or_had_reason`, `has_or_had_style`, `is_or_was_amended_through`, `is_or_was_approved_on`, `is_or_was_archived_as`, `is_or_was_due_on`, `is_or_was_opened_on`, and `is_or_was_used_in` slots. - Each slot includes detailed descriptions, range specifications, and appropriate mappings to existing ontologies.
32 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
32 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Rule: Preserve Bespoke Slots Until Refactoring
|
|
|
|
**Identifier**: `preserve-bespoke-slots-until-refactoring`
|
|
**Severity**: **CRITICAL**
|
|
|
|
## Core Directive
|
|
|
|
**DO NOT remove or migrate "additional" bespoke slots during generic migration passes unless they are the specific target of the current task.**
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
When migrating a specific slot (e.g., `has_approval_date`), you may encounter other bespoke or legacy slots in the same class file (e.g., `innovation_budget`, `operating_budget`).
|
|
|
|
**YOU MUST**:
|
|
* ✅ Migrate ONLY the specific slot you were instructed to work on.
|
|
* ✅ Leave other bespoke slots exactly as they are.
|
|
* ✅ Focus strictly on the current migration target.
|
|
|
|
**YOU MUST NOT**:
|
|
* ❌ Proactively migrate "nearby" slots just because they look like they need refactoring.
|
|
* ❌ Remove slots that seem unused or redundant without specific instruction.
|
|
* ❌ "Clean up" the class file by removing legacy attributes.
|
|
|
|
## Rationale
|
|
|
|
Refactoring is a separate, planned phase. Mixing opportunistic refactoring with systematic slot migration increases the risk of regression and makes changes harder to review. "We will refactor those later."
|
|
|
|
## Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. **Identify Target**: Identify the specific slot(s) assigned for migration (from `slot_fixes.yaml` or user prompt).
|
|
2. **Execute Migration**: Apply changes ONLY for those slots.
|
|
3. **Ignore Others**: Do not touch other slots in the file, even if they violate other rules (like Rule 39 or Rule 53). Those will be handled in their own dedicated tasks.
|